Iran- KFP info Special- the representative of Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) of Iraq in Iran said: as the Kurdistan region delegates under the chairmanship of Nechirvan Barzani, the P.M of KRG, meeting Iranian authority, Pishmergas entrance to Kurdistan areas out of Kurdistan Region was praised.

Nazem Dabbagh the representative of KRG of Iraq in Tehran in talk with KDP .info stated: Kurdistan Region delegations traveled to Tehran and exchanged ideas with the authorities of Islamic Republic of Iran about the changes of current situations. Both sides believed that the terrorists had to have been stood with.

He also said: in this visit Islamic Republic of Iran deemed the Pishmergas entrance to Kurdistan areas located out of the region positive. He added: Iran had no consideration about Pishmergas entrance to the areas out of the region but considered it as collaboration, since if the Pishmergas had not entered those areas it could have been taken up by the ISIS forces.

At the end the representative of KRG of Iraq in Tehran stated: the delegates of Kurdistan region left Tehran for Erbil after visiting Iranian authorities.

Accordance with the international report of Fars, the strategic meeting of Iraq changes in sync with its security changes, with presence of Nazem Debagh, the representative of Kurdistan Region of Iraq in Iran, Hussein Rouyvaran, Senior Expert in affairs of West Africa and Seyyed Rasul Shabibi senior expert in affairs of Iraq, on Wednesday, was held in Fars News Agency June 20.

In this specialized meeting Nazem Dabbagh, the representative of KRG, Hussein Ruyvaran and Seyyed Rasul Shabibi proceeded with their views concerning the emergence of plotting recent crisis as well as interior and exterior factors and exchanged ideas.

 In this meeting recent changes were discussed in three parts. Then some questions were put whose answers represented clearer vision of the causes and reasons of security crisis in Iraq.

First part; the roots and interior potentialities of violence: in this part the experts discussed the roots of the crisis from 2003 to 2011 as well as from 2011 to time before recent third Parliament Elections.

Second part; regional and international of security crisis of Iraq: in this part the experts mentioned regional roles on of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar as well as recent changes of Syria along with America and NATO role by putting fundamental questions in especial about some countries’ hidden support of ISIS. Furthermore the role of Islamic Republic of Iran and Russia were reviewed.

Third part; in this part the experts shared their views in order to exit the new crisis and to establish a future without the presence and interfere of foreign countries in Iraq. In addition the role of Sunni and Shia clerics trying to manage the crisis and to make religions set face against each other.

In a response to questions Nazem Dabbagh mentioned some aspects of current crisis of Iraq. In his view recent insecurity in Mosul and other sites should sooner have occurred. ‘I believe Iraq is an Iraq and its people are the same’ he said. The enemies are now seeking for a fan in the crowds, and where Ba’ath has more influential the differences are high. He supposed that there are still people who have Ba’ath’s thoughts and have penetrated the government and military system of Iraq. Some even remember Iraq, Syria and Egypt unity as “Omme Arabi” (Arabian Mother).

He deems Baghdad inattention to Kurdistan region authority warnings about suspicious movements of Ba’ath in Mosul and their not to be obedient to principal of Baath-elimination passed by Parliament as one of the reason for the emergence of the crisis.

The solution to react ISIS is the unity of all groups of Iraq in his view; the unity which occurred at the time of Saddam forces’ falling. The loss of Mr. Talibani also is one of the concerns that has affected recent crisis. He mentioned the different positions of Americans and also claimed that Saudi Arabia emits forces to Iraq to support ISIS. At last Mr. Dabbagh recommended they can hold a conference in Iran as in Taef for Lebanon to create a unity and dissolve present problems.

The representative of Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) of Iraq in Iran said: Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and Iran are allies and have never kept it a secret.

Nazem Dabbagh the representative of KRG in talk with Levin about Kurdistan Region parties and Iran relations stated: Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and Iran are allies and have never hidden it.

He also said: the Patriotic Union and Iran are allies and in addition Iran desires it to be a strong ally and to collaborate with other political parties and groups of Kurdistan in order to establish security and improvement in new Iraq.

Nazem Dabbagh in other part of his speech about Iran relations with Democrat Party of Kurdistan under Masoud Barzani leadership the president of Kurdistan region said: in spite of current rumors Democrat Party of KRG has a good relationship with Iran.

He also described Nechirvan Barzani recent travel to Iran as a distinctive sample of strong relation Party and Iran and continued to state: furthermore of Kurdistan Region like Socialist, Zahamatkeshan(Laboursit), Islamic Group, and the Move of Change (Guran) have good relations with Iran as well.

After Vietnam War in 20th century Iraq-Iran’s war was the second longest one. It began in 1980 September 1980, and lasted for 8 years, an unfair war which shocked Iran nation and government. As though this war of attrition imposed on two nations and affected all aspects of their lives.

Mainly wars remain undesirable results. Many a countries were destroyed as a result of them, however what is more important is the costs nations bear. During eight-year war against Iran unpleasant and tragic events happened showing unpleasant results of war on different aspects of citizens’ lives of both countries. One of these events was chemical attack of Ba’ath Regime to Sardasht.

Unfortunately the more science has grown, the more military technology has developed. That was why armies continuously managed to manufacture new weapons which included more killing destructive power. The peak of this process was to generate nuclear bombs, chemical and microbiological.

As human conscious is against the generation and using such weapons, however during 20^th century they have been used as massacre weapons against military and non-military aims in wars. Historically the first case of using chemical massacre weapon dates back to first-world War, whereas in Iraq-Iran war this weapon were broadly used under the Ba’ath Army mandate during which many military forces of Iran and first of all the citizens of  both countries got seriously damaged. Saddam used this weapon not only against Iranian people but also against his nation.

Undoubtedly Ba’ath Regime of Saddam was a dictator, authoritarian, racist and expansionist. Saddam deemed all his opponents as enemies whether or not they were Iraqi or not and suppress them by any kind of both normal and abnormal tools.

A review of Saddam behavior toward the nations of these two countries make everyone draw an undeniable conclusion that this dictator did not even respect the primary and absolute rights of the nations. As if nation did not institutionalize in Saddam. It is necessary to remind that the nations of both countries share commons and long years have been living together and had broad relations.

Using chemical weapons by Baath regime was manipulated in a condition that many different international treaties and conventions banned the generation and usage and improvement and export of it. One of these cases was the Geneva protocol in 1995. Interestingly Iraq itself joined the protocol in 1931.

Saddam action clearly was versus the principles and material of mentioned treaties and conventions. The usage of the weapon by Saddam against Iran was so broad that universal society was primarily engaged to form and international treaties early in 1990s. The treaty was signed in Paris in 1993 and got binding in 1997.

Many border cities of Iran and Iraq were chemically attacked by racist army of Ba’ath. One of those cities was Sardasht in June 27, 1987. This attack above all aimed to massacre usual people residing in the town. Thus due to the loss of necessary preparation to confront such cruel act seriously damaged them.

According to available information 130 people lost their lives in this attack and 8000 got injured. This action was an apparent cruelty on the behalf of a wild regime against typical citizens which violates anybody’s conscious and makes him react.

We, the government and people of Kurdistan Regional of Iraq, deeply sympathize with Iranian people especially the victims of Sardasht tragedy like the injuries and survivors and share the pain with them. We also experienced the bitterness of Baath army chemical attack and lost our beloveds in the attack. Now I consider it necessary to mention generously and humanitarian contribution of people and government of Iran to the injuries of Iraq since these contributions relieved out pains and sad.

The imposed war of Iraq on Iran ended long years ago, but it is vital to try describe and analyze the aspects of the dreadful tragedy for the nations of both countries and even for universal society, for there are many people not knowing some aspects of this important event.

Many merely know Sardasht was chemically attacked but they are not aware of other aspects of the case. Thus it is important the actions of the organizations interfering in Kurdistan region of Iraq and Islamic Republic of Iran and even citizens interested in the case spread and necessary cooperation should be prepared and managed to reach the given goals.

Undoubtedly through institutionalizing humanitarian attitude, we have to take basic steps to react massacre weapons in general and chemical weapons in special, and spread these tries for high goals like keeping peace in the region and especially in the relations between both countries.

Iraq and Iran share religious, cultural, civilizational and racial commons; it itself is a potentiality to reach given human goals. We hope nowhere in the world will nations bear the cost imposed by hegemonists’ policies on themselves and neighboring countries.